Template:Did you know nominations/Ding ware


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Ding ware

 * ... that Chinese Ding ware of the 11th century (incense burner illustrated) may be described both as porcelain and as stoneware?


 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Church of England border polls 1915–1916
 * Comment: see current notes 3&4

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 01:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Long enough, 5x expanded within time frame and within policy. It's well written and well illustrated, which is very good for the subject and it is an interesting and beautiful article. The hook is interesting and has been provided with sources. QPQ It fulfills the DYK requirements. If I could make a wish, I would like the sentences supporting the hook to not be in the lead section and also be a bit more stressed, since it's actually an interesting question of definition and could deserve a whole little paragraph of it's own. But the article is perfectly suitable for DYK as it is. Yakikaki (talk) 19:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I recently beefed up porcelain & stoneware on the issue, & have adapted a para & added below. Johnbod (talk) 00:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC)