Template:Did you know nominations/Drexel 4175


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Drexel 4175

 * ... that Drexel 4175, a music manuscript commonplace book belonging to the New York Public Library, is an important source for seventeenth-century English song?

Created by Kosboot (talk). Self nominated at 00:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg I don't know how many DYKs you have submitted so I don't know if you are required to complete a QPQ. I know you've submitted at least one, since I recall reviewing it, and I had the pleasure of reviewing this one as well.  I believe I said of that one that you should submit it to WP:GA, and I will say the same of this one.  I went over it pretty extensively and made some minor edits which you are free to disagree with, of course, and I've verified the hook citations via JSTOR.  So this is ready to go once we settle the QPQ issue.  Again, excellent work.   Gamaliel  ( talk ) 23:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for the nice words! yes, I've submitted several DYKs, but I've never reviewed one (didn't realize about WP:QPQ until you mentioned it), so it might take me some time to learn.  I'll start reading about the process. -- kosboot (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


 * You don't need to review if you've submitted less than five DYKs, but you are always welcome to chip in and review, especially since you are an experienced Wikipedian.  Gamaliel  ( talk ) 00:03, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Kosboot, I should have checked this earlier, sorry, but I ran the QPQ check and found 12 previous DYK submissions so you will have to review an article. But otherwise this article is ready for the front page.  Gamaliel  ( talk ) 18:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I'd like to withdraw this nomination. I've not fulfilled the QPQ - and it'll take me a while to figure out how to do it. -- 14:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kosboot (talk • contribs)


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Withdrawn per creator, who will not be submitted a QPQ review as required for DYK. (Note: if someone would like to donate one of their DYK reviews, that could be used instead, but only if it's done before this closes.) BlueMoonset (talk) 00:46, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll donate a QPQ; we don't have enough manuscript articles. Give me a bit. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg Updating review icon, since QPQ is going to be donated. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I didn't know we could do that. I'm willing to do this as well if Crisco 1492 is unable to.  Gamaliel  ( talk ) 14:29, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I plan on reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Djawoto to completion after Blue brought issues up. Hope this is enough. Gamaliel, I'd avoid donating a QPQ so that you can continue to review this article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg good point, we'd have to get another reviewer since I would be an involved party at that point. Since you've already started your review, no reason why we can't promote this article.  Gamaliel  ( talk ) 17:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Excuse me, but I don't see anything on this template that says a review was actually done. What was checked other than the missing QPQ? please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed.  Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found  at  DYKReviewing guide. — Maile  (talk) 01:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Please review my first comment. I went through the entire toolbox and reviewed the article line by line.  I am confident that this meets DYK criteria.   Gamaliel  ( talk ) 01:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * OK. I'll take you at your word and remove the redirect symbol I had above. — Maile  (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Reinsert tick so it doesn't get lost. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:09, 30 May 2014 (UTC)