Template:Did you know nominations/Dworshak Dam


 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Pumpkin Sky   talk  02:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Dworshak Dam
Created/expanded by Shannon1 (talk). Self nom at 18:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * ... that the 1973 completion of the Dworshak Dam (pictured), one of the tallest in the United States, wiped out one of the world's preeminent runs of steelhead trout?


 * I will review this.
 * Article well exceeds 1500 chars
 * Cites inline


 * Hook is brief and interesting, I added (pictured) as an image accompanies hook
 * Image is PD
 * I added a caption to the image

Remaining issues
 * Could you tell me which section prior to expansion contained copyvio? That is important for determining if the expansion was sufficient.
 * QPQ needed
 * I will go into the more detailed reviewing at a later point, assuming expansion is sufficient. Chris857 (talk) 23:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * While doing research I found the paragraph "In June 1980 the dam developed a leak... an acceptable level" to be copied from here. Also please clarify qpq? Shann º n  01:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Because you have had more than 5 articles on dyk and this is a nomination of your own article, you have to review some one else's nomination quid pro quo (QPQ). Chris857 (talk) 01:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I have never reviewed another DYK hook and I'm not sure if I can do so correctly, also, many of my previous articles in DYK were nominated by other people, and I was not involved in the process. Shann º n  06:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg Taking into account the copyvio you discovered, this article was expanded from 2614 b of prose to 10994 b, only a 4.2x increase. To hit a 5x increase, you need another 2076 b. Do you think you can add that much to the article? Chris857 (talk) 03:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * That I can do. What tool are you using to check readable prose in the article? Shann º n  17:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It's a script (User:Dr_pda/prosesize.js or User:Dr_pda/prosesizebytes.js), though I'm noticing that you have it in your javascript file. Are you using the monobook skin? It should display a "Page size" button underneath Toolbox on the left panel. Chris857 (talk) 02:23, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Alright, the prose has now increased to 13 KB. It won't show any more accurately, so I'm hoping this is enough. Shann º n  04:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The slightly different version shows more accurately, add you need 139 b more, probably about another sentence. Chris857 (talk) 23:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Added a little blurb about the Dworshak fish hatchery, comes in at around 170 bytes. Shann º n  04:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Pictogram_voting_keep.svg good-to-go as far as i'm concerned BUT i wasn't able to confirm word-count. If any assistance is needed to stretch existing prose I'd be happy to work some magic. If my input means anything.Penwatchdog (talk) 15:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * According to the above javascript file the current version has 13,093 characters of prose/2,146 words, and the old version had 2,614 characters of prose/417 words, which might be a sufficient expansion. Shann º n  16:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Pictogram_voting_keep.svg Be it so, "KEEP!" i say~! Penwatchdog (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)