Template:Did you know nominations/Early Nationalists


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 14:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Early Nationalists

 * ... that the Early Nationalists were the beginning of the organised national movement in India?
 * Comment: Article was moved to mainspace on 4-18-14. Note: user:Rudra john cena is listed as the original author, but that was the former name (now discarded) for user:Jim Cartar, so Jim Cartar should be listed as author
 * Comment: Article was moved to mainspace on 4-18-14. Note: user:Rudra john cena is listed as the original author, but that was the former name (now discarded) for user:Jim Cartar, so Jim Cartar should be listed as author

Created by Jim Cartar (talk), Sitush (talk), Philg88 (talk). Nominated by MelanieN (talk) at 15:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg The word "formal" should be removed from the hook and the article. The source says it was the "starting point of the organised national movement in India", adding "formal" does not make sense. Still reading the rest of the article. -Zanhe (talk) 18:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * A few sections need citations, which I've marked in the article. In addition, the "Sessions" table is mostly unsourced, which needs to be fixed. I've added to the credit list as he has also made significant contributions to the article. -Zanhe (talk) 23:34, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm also adding to the credit list, since he have also significantly contributed.    J i m Carter  ( talk ) 05:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I have all the issues.   J i m Carter  ( talk ) 10:36, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Thanks for fixing the issues so quickly. The article is new enough, long enough, and well referenced. Hook is interesting and supported with inline reference. No copyvio detected. QPQ not necessary for a non-self nomination. AGF on offline sources. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 19:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)