Template:Did you know nominations/Ecology Party of Florida


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Ecology Party of Florida

 * ... that Ralph Nader was a candidate of the Ecology Party of Florida in 2008?


 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Maheshinte Prathikaaram & Template:Did you know nominations/By the Blue Hawaiian Waters
 * Comment: per an ANI decision, two reviews of this nom are required

Created by LavaBaron (talk). Self-nominated at 16:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Thank you for an interesting article, on good sources, long and new enough, neutral, without apparent copyvio. Don't assume an international readership to remember who Nader is, better mention something about presidency in the hook, - a good time to do so. Wishes for the article: no text sqeezed between an image and the infobox, - getting rid of the link to the article (actually better not to use the party's website as reference), - chronology in the later activities. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg [2 of 2] You do not seem to have taken any action on Gerda's comments above. I agree with her findings of newness, length, neutrality and copyvios. I would like to suggest ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ALT1 ... that Ralph Nader was nominated by the Ecology Party of Florida as a presidential candidate in 2008?
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed to check ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg I can confirm Cwmhiraeth and Gerda's reviews, and can also say that ALT1 is fine. I have addressed two of Gerda's points myself (they are minor, and do not constitute involvement in the article). Personally, I would be okay passing this now, as I feel the party website is not used for anything it shouldn't be used for; but since Gerda Arendt was the original reviewer, I'd prefer it if they have a look before ticking this. Vanamonde (talk) 07:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Fine with me, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg New and long enough, QPQ nominations done, all non-lead ¶ with citations, a copyvio check reveals no problems, hook content is verified with a citation to a reliable source in the article (source). I prefer the wording in ALT1. North America1000 09:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)