Template:Did you know nominations/Edward L. Hedden


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 04:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Edward L. Hedden

 * ... that Edward L. Hedden's father studied law under Alexander Hamilton? Source
 * Reviewed: Pichu Pichu

Created by Alexschmidt711 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Hook within acceptable limits, and interesting; Citations in order; Article created in timely fashion, QPQ satisfied. Article is good to go. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 23:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg This hook makes me wonder why we're not writing an article about his father instead. Yoninah (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hedden's father was not notable enough for an article. Alexschmidt711 (talk) 11:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Right. I should have added to my previous comment that you should write a hook that talks about the subject of your article, not about his father. Yoninah (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Good point. Unfortunately, I can't think of any general-interest hooks from this article that focus mainly on Hedden. Alexschmidt711 (talk) 18:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Here's an idea:
 * ALT1: ... that a good word from his son-in-law's employer gained Edward L. Hedden the position of Collector of the Port of New York? Yoninah (talk) 15:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I like it. Alexschmidt711 (talk) 16:29, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Thank you. Since I wrote the hook, another reviewer needs to approve it. Pinging . Yoninah (talk) 17:04, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't find it especially interesting, i.e.he got a job through a reference, but okay, good enough. At least we're not highlighting a 'second person' to the subject of the article. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 17:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * it's hard to find good hooks about city employees, but I thought this was ok. Could you restore the tick? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:19, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 17:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)