Template:Did you know nominations/Elisabeth von Heyking


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 11:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Elisabeth von Heyking

 * ... that Elisabeth von Heyking debut novel was reprinted over 40 times in its first year of publication?
 * ALT1: ... that Elisabeth von Heyking debut novel sold out within three weeks of its release?


 * Reviewed: Twenty Years a Dream

Created by 97198 (talk). Self-nominated at 05:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Long enuf, new enuf, neutral tone, interesting and cited hook, backed by offline/foreign lang sources. Pic is PD. However -- I am not sure fembio is RS. What's the provenance? By the looks of it, it's a blog. So unless it's one of those exceptions whereby a noted authority prefers to use a blogging platform to spread knowledge, I wouldn't pass this. Thanks. Kingoflettuce (talk) 10:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The writer of the source appears to be an academic but I get what you mean. I've suggested ALT1, which is sourced to a German-language book. 97198 (talk) 14:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but the issue still remains -- is fembio RS? Whether the hook's cited to that or another source is secondary. The article as a whole must only be sourced to Rses. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I would argue that it doesn't matter too much for the sake of DYK – if there is something in the DYK rules that I'm not aware of please correct me. The hook fact is cited to a reliable source, and the article is not a BLP so we don't have to be extra-vigilant about sourcing. For what it's worth, FemBio seems to be used enough in four non-English Wikipedias that there is a template for citing it. 97198 (talk) 09:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Could we please get a second opinion here? Note that all aspects of the hook and article have been approved except for one source. 97198 (talk) 10:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

- As the hook is not using "FemBio" and it is only used for 2 uncontroversial sentences in the article, I don't think we should stop this DYK on that basis. ツStacey (talk) 08:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, I came by to promote this, but I think you can do much more with the hook for the lead image slot, like:
 * ALT2: ... that Elisabeth von Heyking (pictured) first novel sold out within three weeks of its release and was reprinted more than 40 times in its first year of publication? Yoninah (talk) 23:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yoninah, the ALT2 relies on the problematic source which the original reviewer wasn't keen on. ツStacey (talk) 10:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Reiterating original status given where there were issues with the source supporting the original hook, and thus the analogous info in ALT2. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ALT1 has already been ticked so I think it's best to go with that. 97198 (talk) 10:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg OK. Restoring tick for ALT1 per Staceydolxx's review. Yoninah (talk) 11:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)