Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth Chambers Morgan


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by        FITINDIA   12:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Elizabeth Chambers Morgan

 * ... that from 1888 to 1895, Elizabeth Chambers Morgan was the leading woman in the Chicago labor movement? "From 1888 to 1895 Elizabeth Morgan became the leading female figure in the Chicago labor movement." Link Source: Women building Chicago 1790-1990 : a biographical dictionary. Schultz, Rima Lunin, 1943-, Hast, Adele., Paul Avrich Collection (Library of Congress). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 2001. pp. 608–610. ISBN 9780253338525. OCLC 44573291
 * ALT1:... that in 1888, Elizabeth Chambers Morgan worked to found the Illinois Woman's Alliance to fight for working women and children? Source:  Women building Chicago 1790-1990 : a biographical dictionary. Schultz, Rima Lunin, 1943-, Hast, Adele., Paul Avrich Collection (Library of Congress). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 2001. pp. 608–610. ISBN 9780253338525. OCLC 44573291
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Los Angeles Times–Washington Post News Service

Created by MidwestCuttlefish (talk). Self-nominated at 20:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC).
 * Symbol question.svg the hook has inline citation, but the source is offline (not verifiable). If you still have access to the source, could you attach to hook 1 above (the original hook) a direct quote from the source that supports it? All else is fine: recent (sandbox move Nov. 6), long, cited, neutral, ref 4 is online and found no copyvio, assume good faith on refs 1 to 3, spot checks do match with this online source:, , QPQ review is done. User:MidwestCuttlefish: I edited the article, feel free to revert. Bammesk (talk) 03:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I can see that snippet of 608 in Google Books. Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:47, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * How does that look? Also, thanks for your edits. MidwestCuttlefish (talk) 20:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * That's good. I added a google-snippet link to the hook above (per user:Maury Markowitz). I found ref. 3 online, I also did some spot checks of refs 1 and 2 with google-snippets, I found some close paraphrasing, and I will look into it some more. User:MidwestCuttlefish, for example, this string is a direct copy of ref. 1: "was one of ten children of Thomas and Sarah Chambers, who were both unskilled factory workers", this string is a direct copy of ref. 3 except for the two words in italics: "Morgan led the group of Chicago women who established the Ladies' Federal Labor Union No. 2703". You can help by removing similar wording/sentence structures. Interesting article. Bammesk (talk) 04:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg I removed close paraphrases and edited the article, diff (I have refs 1, 3, 4, not 2, I edited sentences cited to ref 2 anyway, to remove potential paraphrase violations). Nomination is good to go. Bammesk (talk) 19:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! MidwestCuttlefish (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)