Template:Did you know nominations/Elvis' Greatest Shit

Elvis' Greatest Shit

 * ... that Elvis' Greatest Shit was in 1982?
 * Reviewed: Not a self nom

Created/expanded by Ritchie333 (talk) 7&6=thirteen (talk}.  Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 15:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg Shouldn't the sentence structure be something like ... that Elvis' Greatest Shit was released in 1982?. Article is new, long, and properly cited. Samar  Talk 19:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


 * A natural for next April Fool's Day. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * You can't hold it for that long :) Samar  Talk 19:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hehe, I like the double meaning there. For April Fools we can hold it as long as we want (and yeah, I was thinking of holding it when I saw the article being discussed at WP:AN. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Using "released" in the hook takes away from the humor in the line. If it had to be expanded, I would suggest using:
 * ... that Elvis' Greatest Shit was dropped in 1982? - Theornamentalist (talk) 00:12, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * That is even better, LOL. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Brilliant ALT!  Schwede 66  05:27, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg for the alternate. Do you wish to hold it for fool's day then? Samar  Talk 06:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes sir (?) yes sir, three bags full. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * nope, I am from the fairer gender
 * *Raise cap* ma'am
 * Since the release of a record is sometimes referred to as its being "dropped", how about changing "released" to "dropped"? Cbl62 (talk) 05:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops. I see somebody already thought of it.  Good one. Cbl62 (talk) 05:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)