Template:Did you know nominations/Environmental globalization


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw (talk) 22:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Environmental globalization

 * ... that environmental globalization refers to internationally coordinated practices and regulations regarding environmental protection, and is sometimes seen as an impediment to economic globalization?


 * ALT1:... that anti-economic globalization activists are likely to support environmental globalization?
 * Comment: ALT1 is more sexy. Really wanted to find a ref that would allow inclusion of anti-globalization term, but couldn't find one. PS. Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Jung Mina for QPQ. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: ALT1 is more sexy. Really wanted to find a ref that would allow inclusion of anti-globalization term, but couldn't find one. PS. Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Jung Mina for QPQ. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 14:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Piotrus, this is nearly there. QPQ checks out, new enough, long enough, neutral, etc. Cited inline, and the hook fact is supported. However, ALT1, which I much prefer, says "ant-economic globalization activists," while the article says "environmental activists." The two are not necessarily the same, and the hook fact needs to be in the article. Can you fix this? Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, the article states " environmental activists might might be opposed to economic globalization", which I sourced to . The source states "an environmental activist might criticie economic or corporate globalization but advocate environmental--ffff globalization or worldwide standards for air and water purity". If you'd have suggestion on how to word the hook, or the article, better, given the source, I'd appreciate it - I did think long and hard about this before, and I still don't have a better solution then the present wording. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * So why not say exactly that, more or less as you've done in the article at the bottom of the first section? That way, there's no issues. Vanamonde (talk) 12:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Piotrus, it's been over two weeks since Vanamonde93 responded. Please address this soon. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I missed it as I wasn't pinged. Is the following ALT acceptable, User:Vanamonde93? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * ALT2: ...that environmental activists might might be opposed to economic globalization, but advocate environmental globalization?
 * Yes, ALT2 is acceptable, Symbol voting keep.svg based on prior review. Struck original hook and ALT1 (this is ALT2, btw, I've changed the number). Vanamonde (talk) 15:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)