Template:Did you know nominations/Errors as to precedent facts in Singapore law

Errors as to precedent facts in Singapore law

 * ... that in a 1998 case the Singapore Court of Appeal held the Internal Security Act contained no precedent facts as Parliament clearly intended that detention decisions were to be made by the Government?
 * Reviewed: MV Spiegelgracht
 * Comment: The article was moved from a sandbox on 23 January 2012. The hook is referenced by footnotes 29, 32 and 33.

Created/expanded by Aleksgeo (talk), Csteo2009 (talk), Gladchoo (talk), Jiehui.ang.2009 (talk), Niktoh (talk), and Wlchew.2009 (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 17:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Much effort and research has gone into this article. It seems good to me including length, date of creation and sourcing. Hook also seems satisfactory as far as I can see. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)