Template:Did you know nominations/Evangelical Heritage Version


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Evangelical Heritage Version

 * Symbol confirmed.svg ... that the Evangelical Heritage Version of the Bible was translated by a group of Lutheran volunteers?
 * ALT1:... that a group made up entirely of volunteers translated the Evangelical Heritage Version of the Bible in less than 5 years?
 * Reviewed: [|Easton Area Public Library]
 * Comment: This is my first time doing this, so if you need anything or have any suggestions, please let me know.

Created by LittlePuppers (talk). Self-nominated at 21:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC).


 * Hi Little, I'll be reviewing this one.– Lionel(talk) 04:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svgle is new enough. Long enough. Paraphrasing ok; no copyvios. Hook looks good. One small thing: this needs a reference: " It was funded solely by donations." – Lionel(talk) 04:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know - I'm quite busy at the moment, but I should be able to do that this afternoon. LittlePuppers (talk) 12:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I changed that sentance to "Although the project is lead mostly by WELS pastors and teachers, the EHV is not owned by or funded by the WELS." with a citation, because I couldn't find a good citation for the original, and also because, as an afterthought, that they are probably recieving money from the published version as well now. Thanks again for looking at this and brining that to my attention. LittlePuppers (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Ok, good to go!– Lionel(talk) 01:49, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * How long is it supposed to take for this to be promoted to approved? It seems like the bot usually does it fairly quickly. LittlePuppers (talk) 03:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I think there's a backlog. And, I think humans move nominations to approved queue. – Lionel(talk) 10:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * There is indeed a backlog of approved hooks, currently about a week's worth. However, the tick icon needs to go in the body of the review so it's the last active icon on the review page, not next to a particular hook. (Right now, it's the original slash that holds sway, not the tick that was later inserted above it.) Lionel, if you could please add the icon below with a statement as to which of the hooks are approved (or if both, say both), that will likely catch the eye of a hook promoter (definitely human) in the relatively near future. Hooks go to prep first, and subsequently a human moves the prep contents to a queue, and then from queue a bot moves it to the main page. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for your help. By the way, it does appears to be WugBot that moves these from nominations to approved. LittlePuppers (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, WugBot does do the moving to the Approved page. And it will only move nominations where the tick icon is placed the lowest on the page. Hook promoters only look on the Approved page for nominations to promote to prep, another reason why it's important to place the icon in the proper place. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg ALT1 approved!– Lionel(talk) 22:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)