Template:Did you know nominations/Evidence for speciation by reinforcement


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Evidence for speciation by reinforcement
Created by Chiswick Chap (talk) and Azcolvin429 (talk). Nominated by Azcolvin429 (talk) at 01:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC).
 * ...the evidence for speciation by reinforcement has been found across a wide range of taxa?
 * ALT1 ... the evidence for speciation by reinforcement has been found across a wide range of organisms?
 * ALT2 ... the evidence for speciation by reinforcement comes from observations in nature, laboratory experiments, and comparative studies?
 * ALT3 ... the evidence for speciation by reinforcement has led to scientific acceptance of the theory?
 * ALT4 ... the evidence for speciation by reinforcement has led to a scientific consensus of the processes occurrence in nature?
 * ALT5 ... evidence for speciation by reinforcement largely accrued since the 1990s?


 * Symbol voting keep.svg Date, size, references, copyvio check, ok (was created 5 March). It's well-written and well-sourced. I support ALT0 and ALT1 I think are the more interesting statements. ALT1 is probably more accessible language. T.Shafee(Evo &#38; Evo)talk 07:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)