Template:Did you know nominations/Eyewitness memory

Not enough expansion, enough expansion unlikely and possibly undesirable

Eyewitness memory

 * … that eyewitness memory, and therefore eyewitness testimony, is not particularly reliable?
 * Comment: improved as part of class project

5x expanded by Blford (talk), Tamara Hill (talk). Nominated by Greta Munger (talk) at 19:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg-Hook, source is fine. Expansion is ~1.5x (35622/234320)Smallman12q (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg An article that is only 1.5x expanded is not eligible. The nomination can be revisited (or the article re-nominated) if it is substantially expanded in the future, but given the size of the article already that is not likely (and probably not desirable, given Wikipedia's guidelines on article length). r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)