Template:Did you know nominations/FTC v. Actavis, Inc.

FTC v. Actavis, Inc.

 * ... that reverse payment settlements of patent litigations are not immune from antitrust liability in the United States?

Created/expanded by EricChuang676 (talk). Nominated by Anthonysutardja (talk) at 16:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like ALT1: ... that United States Supreme Court case FTC v. Actavis, Inc. challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry? The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --S.G.(GH) ping! 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: I did some formatting on both hooks, without changing any of the content. M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  19:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:06, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Long enough, new enough, neutral enough. Hook sourced. Copyvio check chucks up nothing.-- Laun  chba  ller  19:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Why I didn't put a confirmed tick there myself, I wanted a second opinion and redirected me to, who has never responded. If you feel it is acceptable as is then you have my full permission.--  Laun  chba  ller  09:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg Comment: Adding a tick should always be done by the reviewer, not by someone else for the reviewer, who may (as noted) have good reasons not to add it. I queried Crisco because he had expressed issues with some conclusions cited to primary sources (the court cases themselves) in a nomination similar to this one, and I thought it would be a good idea to ask him to see whether those issues were present here as well. If Thingg believes the article is ready, then a specific comment stating so is fine. Interpolating a hook in someone else's review really shouldn't be done: if a tick or other icon is missing, the best thing is to query their talk page. In my experience, the icon was deliberately withheld about half the time, and accidentally omitted the other half. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I thought he had forgetten. Removed it. Thingg &#8853;&#8855; 18:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Passed.-- Laun  chba  ller  20:40, 14 December 2013 (UTC)