Template:Did you know nominations/Flag of Tonga


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:17, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Flag of Tonga

 * ... that the Constitution of Tonga stipulates that the kingdom's flag (pictured) can never be changed?
 * ALT1:... that the flag of Tonga (pictured) can never be changed due to Article 47 of the kingdom's constitution?
 * Reviewed: Soerabaijasch Handelsblad

5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self nominated at 00:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Hook length and content OK. Statement sourced online to a reliable source (subscription service). Good to go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GDuwen (talk • contribs) 17:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg This review is incomplete. The reviewer needs to verify the 5x expansion as well as check the sources for close paraphrasing. Yoninah (talk) 22:56, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Whoops, thought the article was new (my bad there). After a second look, it was expanded on a fivefold of readable prose. (From its previous size of 518 characters [May 7, 2013], it was expanded to 2592 [August 10, 2014]) Since the source of the statement on the hook links to an online subscription service, I can't really check for close paraphrasing. I would pass it based on good faith, but due that there's doubt from another editor, I suggest to find an inline reliable source.-- GD uwen    Tell me!   15:54, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg AGF and close paraphrasing are two different checks. While the hook is sourced to an offline ref, the online refs in the article all need to be checked. New review: 5x expansion verified. Article is new enough, long enough, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen in online sources. QPQ done. Offline hook ref AGF and cited inline. Image is pd. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 19:49, 16 August 2014 (UTC)