Template:Did you know nominations/Florida v. Jardines, Florida v. Harris

Florida v. Jardines, Florida v. Harris

 * ... that 28 U.S. states have asked the Supreme Court to allow police dogs (pictured) to sniff at the front door of any house – without a search warrant or even probable cause – even if the dog is wrong 4 out of 5 times?
 * Reviewed: I still have to review another nomination and will do that shortly.
 * QPQ not necessary for editors with less than 5 DYK credits. Toolserver DYK check show this editor has only had one other DYK nomination. — Maile (talk) 14:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Two timely Supreme Court articles that I had put a LOT of time into. I could have swore the rule was 10 days, but that just may be early-onset senility setting in... One reviewer said "awesome article, good job!" I was told on the WT:DYK page to submit it anyhow... Also, I'm adding the "4 out of 5 bit" to the Florida v. Harris article now, done in a few minutes....  done.

Created by Grolltech (talk). Self nom at 01:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)


 * FYI 5-DAY timeline, Not exactly, DYK provides the leeway to IAR on the 5-day thing. This nomination is worth looking at. — Maile  (talk) 02:45, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg For two such well written and worthwhile articles, the date of nomination can be elastic :). I consider both articles to be new enough and they are certainly long enough. They are well-referenced, the hook is sourced with appropriate inline citations and the image is appropriately licensed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Groll &tau;ech  ( talk ) 09:03, 12 November 2012 (UTC)