Template:Did you know nominations/Forced seduction


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:09, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Forced seduction

 * ... that the literary motif of "forced seduction" was called a male rape fantasy, an attempt by the hero to get to know the heroine, a useful lesson for women to not dress sexy, and an enjoyable fantasy?
 * Reviewed: Hooks in Template:Did you know nominations/Barton Currie. Copy edits for Template:Did you know nominations/HOP Ranch. Tweaks for Template:Did you know nominations/Jonas Wood.

Created by Drmies (talk). Self nominated at 04:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol possible vote.svg Everything checks out technically except one part of the hook - the last part. That isn't directly cited, and the indirect cite is more specific, I'm not sure I'd be happy stretching it to the generality here. If you're ok with it, I'd suggest simply dropping everything after the last comma, or alternately replacing it with something along the lines of "who then fall in love.". Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, Maury Markowitz, it's cited to the Jaid Black quote. But if you like, I can tweak this some (sourced to the same quote):
 * ALT1: ... that the literary motif of "forced seduction" was called a male rape fantasy, a female rape fantasy, an attempt by the hero to get to know the heroine, and a useful lesson for women to not dress sexy? Drmies (talk) 15:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok, that does work. I'm still not entirely happy with the wordiness of the hook, I think there's likely much shorter and hookier statements, but that's not a reason not to go as-is. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)


 * BTW, Google Translate does a fantastic job on that article. It's a seemingly perfect translation. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)