Template:Did you know nominations/Fordillidae, Fordilla, Pojetaia

Fordillidae, Fordilla, Pojetaia

 * ... that both Fordilla and Pojetaia, Cambrian members of the extinct bivalve family Fordillidae, are part of the Turkish small shelly fauna?
 * Reviewed: Sargassumfish, Ammophila sabulosa, Panicum hemitomon
 * Comment: see Elicki and Gürsu 2009

Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 18:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Passing comment (aka not a review): QPQs? Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Last I was aware the consensus was one review per hook, as opposed to one per article in a hook.-- Kev min  § 18:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I seem to remember differently. I guess it depends on the reviewer's choice... Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It has always been one per article.
 * Please Make the Fordillidae ref 3 more precise. It seems to be providing a reference for two sentences. It should not require that I read 25 pages to WP:V this hook.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The articles pass for length and date. The refs seem to be WP:RS. The hook just needs to be verified, which I will do after the precise pages are indicated.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Re reference 3: See the abstract and introduction, which note the papers scope investigating the small shelly fauna of Turkeys Cal Tepe Formation.-- Kev min  § 14:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The point was for you to fix the inline citation for WP:V purposes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I have cited the articles used per the conventions used in the relevant scientific fields. As such it complies with WP:V.  If you have problems with this citation formatting it should be brought up with the appropriate projects which cover the citation are of the MoS and see of there is any consensus for changing it.  It should not be brought up on individual DYK noms.-- Kev  min  § 17:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't see where in the abstract or intro it says these are part of the claimed family.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Pages 281 and 283 of article.-- Kev min  § 10:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg everything checks out.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)