Template:Did you know nominations/Forglen House

Forglen House

 * ... that Forglen House (pictured) cost only £16,000 to build?
 * ALT1:... that Forglen House (pictured) is a "confection" with "romantic aspirations" poured into it?
 * ALT2:... that Forglen House (pictured) has seen feudal leaders, attack, and death?
 * Reviewed: Indemnity Act 1717

Moved to mainspace by Sagaciousphil (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 12:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg detailed article on a wealth of good sources. Impressive image is free. Three hooks are all sourced, but I am not yet "hooked". The first lacks spirit, and its "only" gets relative when we look at the conversion rate. The last one is something that could be said about many older houses. Leaves #2, but please reword a bit: "a confection" is not too impressive without "Elizabethan Gothic", but I would go instead for "all the romantic aspirations of the early 19th century poured into it", --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:22, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Gerda. I love the wording of the that quote too. I've put ALT4 incorporating it below and struck the others for clarity.  SagaciousPhil   -  Chat  05:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * ALT3 ... that Forglen House (pictured) has "all the romantic aspirations of the early 19th century poured into it"?
 * Symbol confirmed.svg as pictured! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Either ALT1 needs a tweak or the article does.  The quote in the article does not say "poured into it".  — Maile  (talk) 22:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I can fix it, it's from the source. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Gerda fixed it. — Maile (talk) 12:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)