Template:Did you know nominations/Fragmentarium


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Fragmentarium

 * ... that Fragmentarium digital research laboratory hopes to reunite lost fragments of medieval manuscripts (pictured)? Source: "In the library, too, fragments are hidden in boxes..."90 percent of these fragments are lost worldwide", says Flüeler. To find these again or to unite, would not be possible without Big Data. In this way, researchers have the opportunity to research the writing style, the places of origin, mostly monasteries, and their written culture...You can now try to reassemble these parts over the Internet."  Lucerne Zeitunggoogle translate version
 * Reviewed: Lineus sanguineus

Created by Mramoeba (talk). Self-nominated at 16:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC).


 * The article was created within 7 days of listing. It has not been featured in In The News.  Article is long enough and is not a stub.  Article is thoroughly and correctly referenced.  The hook is referenced immediately afterwards with reference number 8.  Reference 8 is in German, but the newspaper is a reliable one and the reference says what the wiki article says it says.  Earwig shows no copyvios, and where there are similarities they are in institution names and so on.  Hook is less than 200 characters and punchy.  The image is free and on the page, and looks okay at 100 x 100 pixels.

All foreign language sources have been checked and are RS, and say what the article says they say. Red Fiona (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Nominator comment, just looking at the image on the nom, I think this image from the same page is a better illustration of the subject so could perhaps be substituted. Not quite sure how to format that into the template. Manuscript fragment reused as book binding Mramoeba (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sadly that's beyond my tech skills. Hopefully one of the admins knows how to do that.  Red Fiona (talk) 19:05, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Here you go. Yoninah (talk) 00:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ah yes that looks better. Thanks Yoninah Mramoeba (talk) 08:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)