Template:Did you know nominations/Francis Doughty (clergyman)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Francis Doughty (clergyman)

 * ... that the early American minister Francis Doughty had a proclivity for witch-hunting?


 * Reviewed: Werewolves of Ossory
 * Comment: Possible Halloween hook

Created by StAnselm (talk). Self-nominated at 02:58, 10 October 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Long enough, new enough, and hook is cited to RS. Good to go. LavaBaron (talk) 10:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg What about all the other DYK criteria?  As a courtesy to the nominator, could you please list, so this stands a better chance of not being pulled from prep on something missed? — Maile  (talk) 23:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Yup, it met all of them. Good to go. LavaBaron (talk) 07:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

New reviewer needed. Please provide details of review. DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 6 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at  DYKReviewing guide — Maile  (talk) 12:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg As per administrator ruling here, it's been determined no further review is needed. This is cleared for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 04:07, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg There was no such administrator ruling or determination; reinstating Maile's request for a new reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg A discussion in DYK Talk has failed consensus that the review is unacceptable; I don't want to engage in vote-counting but, to make things concise, I'll note 4 editors have proferred the belief it is acceptable, 4 have objected, and 2 have unclear opinions. For lack of a consensus to overturn the review, it is clear for queue. LavaBaron (talk) 15:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Review by Maile
 * QPQ done by StAnselm October 10-13, 2015
 * Eligibility
 * Article created by StAnselm on October 9, 2015 and contains 1601 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
 * Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags
 * Hook, Sourcing and copyvio check
 * Every paragraph sourced
 * No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
 * Earwig's copyvio detector show no issues of concern: Earwig's check October 24, 2015
 * Hook is fine at 83 characters, NPOV, sourced and stated in the article.
 * Image
 * No image in either the hook or the article.


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Your nomination passes and is good to be promoted. — Maile  (talk) 13:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)