Template:Did you know nominations/Günther Schneider-Siemssen

{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk| 
 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

{{DYK conditions}}

Günther Schneider-Siemssen

 * ... that the scenic design for Wagner's Ring cycle by Günther Schneider-Siemssen (pictured) was shown at the Metropolitan Opera from 1986 to 2009? Source:
 * Reviewed: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
 * Comment: Best on his birthday, 7 June. - I found the article as a draft when I wanted to fill the red link, only did minor formatting.

Moved to mainspace by LiamRowe (talk) and Gerda Arendt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 10:14, 3 June 2019 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Right now there's an unreferenced paragraph that needs to be cited (the one that starts "As a guest..."), so this will need to be resolved before it gets promoted. The hook is okay, but there seem to be other aspects about his career that are more eye-catching. How about:
 * ALT1 !-- ... that the stage designs of Günther Schneider-Siemssen were used in opera houses such as the Metropolitan Opera in New York City and the Teatro Colón in Buenos Aires?
 * ALT2 ... that Günther Schneider-Siemssen (pictured) pioneered and developed a symbolic style of using hand-painted projections and sophisticated special effects for opera set designs?
 * Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Narutolovehinata5, thank you for looking and suggesting. I looked for a reference for Teatro Colon, but can't find any but his website, and something is so wrong with it that I won't even link to it. (Google finds it, but then you end somewhere else ...) Instead, I have now the more general (and more impressive) list from the obituaries. I wish we had a short way to name the Austrian Bundestheater as the Germans can do. ALT2 is a good idea, but doesn't suggest the worldwide impact. I picked the Ring cycle because its significance (20 hours of music, many scenes to design) is rather well known, and to keep one production that long is unusual and tells a lot about its quality, + he received a price for it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg Sorry for the late reply as I've been rather busy in real life. The article seems to meet requirements and a QPQ has been done. The part about him being buried in an honorary grave is unreferenced. As I proposed ALT1, I'll probably have to leave the rest of the review to another reviewer, but these are the main issues at the moment. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:23, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I added a ref for the grave group and number. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:44, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Thanks, ready for a new reviewer to choose between ALT0 and ALT2. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg I prefer ALT2 as it sounds more interesting. I assume good faith on the German reference. SL93 (talk) 01:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The original works also and I understand the nominator's reasoning, so it is best to pick that one. It is referenced fine as well. SL93 (talk) 01:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

|}}