Template:Did you know nominations/Gaboimilla


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Gaboimilla

 * ... that Gaboimilla, a mythical Chilean queen, is said to have allowed men into her kingdom only for procreation? "permitted men among htem only at a time suitable for procreation"
 * ALT1:... that Gaboimilla is said to have been queen of a 16th-century Southern Chilean kingdom rich in gold and luxury goods and populated only by women? "ruler of a large and rich province populated only by women" "they riase a great quantity of gold and they make very rich goods"
 * Reviewed: To follow

Created by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 13:14, 19 April 2018 (UTC).


 * Article is new, long enough, sourced and appropriately cited and looks free of copyvio/plagiarism. The hooks are interesting and cited in the article. All that is required is the completion of the QPQ review. Gatoclass (talk) 13:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Gatoclass, thanks for your review. I have now carried out a QPQ at Template:Did you know nominations/Cacopsylla pyricola - Dumelow (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg I was a little concerned, after re-reading the article, that two of the sources describe the location of the kingdom as "south of Chile" - all the more puzzling given that there is nothing on the South American continent "South of Chile". However, the other sources all refer to the subject as a Chilean figure, and it seems the apparent discrepancy is due to the fact that Chile was a growing province of Spain at the time of the aforesaid reports and not the same entity as the modern state. The QPQ has been satisfactorily completed so all DYK requirements for this nomination are met. Both hooks are good and I have no preference so the selection can be left to the promoter. Gatoclass (talk) 16:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)