Template:Did you know nominations/Ghulam Moinuddin Khanji


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Ghulam Moinuddin Khanji

 * ... that the Khan of Manavadar Ghulam Moinuddin Khanji (pictured) represented India at Western Asiatic Games?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kingdom of the Aures
 * Comment: Feel free to suggest other hooks

Created by Royroydeb (talk). Self-nominated at 06:57, 5 April 2019 (UTC).




 * , there is nothing wrong with your hook, but if you could come up with an ALT that mentions hockey, that might create more interest. Please alert me here if you have something else for me to approve, and perhaps you would also see what can be done about the licensing of the image? Moonraker (talk) 14:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The image is in public domain
 * ALT1:... that the Khan of Manavadar Ghulam Moinuddin Khanji (pictured) played in the Indian hockey team at the Western Asiatic Games? RRD (talk) 17:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg ALT1 is cited and can be used., my point is that the one tag on the image says it may not be in the public domain outside India. I think it is less likely to be used if you can't add a US license for it. Moonraker (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I have now removed it .RRD (talk) 16:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


 * --The nominator and the reviewer are asked to clarify about the reliability of the most-exploited source in the article. I don't see how that passes RS. &#x222F; WBG converse 05:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , that source may or may not have been "exploited", I see no way of telling, but it is not cited, and Earwig is not finding any "copyvio" problem. Do you see any non-reliable sources being relied on in the article? Moonraker (talk) 00:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , I removed the source out. &#x222F; WBG converse 18:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Very well,, and I have added new sources for what was left uncited. This is now ready to go with either hook, but I should say ALT1 is stronger. Moonraker (talk) 20:08, 18 April 2019 (UTC)