Template:Did you know nominations/Global Climate Coalition


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by SST  flyer  13:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Consensus on WT:DYK against running this

Global Climate Coalition

 * ... that the Global Climate Coalition, an international business lobbyist group active from 1989 through 2001, played a role in blocking ratification of the Kyoto Protocol by the United States?


 * Comment: fewer than 5 DYK credits, thank you
 * Comment: fewer than 5 DYK credits, thank you

Improved to Good Article status by HughD (talk). Self-nominated at 22:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC).


 * Confirm HughD has only previous DYK credit according to QPQ check, so no QPQ is required... which is good because HughD has just been blocked for 6 months at AE and so will be unable to work to support this nomination. EdChem (talk) 05:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


 * HMMM an article on a topic that the editor was topic banned for, insisted on going through with and then getting a six-month ban. Should that behavior really be rewarded with a DYK if it meets the criteria?  MPJ  -DK 01:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I have started a discussion of what to do with this nomination. EdChem (talk) 03:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg We will not allow banned editors to be rewarded for violating their ban. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 09:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)