Template:Did you know nominations/Go Nawaz Go (slogan)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Nominator has decided to withdraw this

Go Nawaz Go (slogan)

 * ... that Go Nawaz Go is a controversial Pakistani chant against current Pakistani Prime Minister and become huge popular in short time?

Created by Saqib (talk). Self nominated at 13:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC).
 * Hook and newness checked. Length is without a doubt ok. But can you give a context for what "short span of time" mean?  OhanaUnited  Talk page  02:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * User:BlueMoonset: See history. I've fixed it a long time ago. --Saqib (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Saqib, so you know in future, you need to report progress here at the nomination after an issue is raised. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:54, 8 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed, including such checks as close paraphrasing and neutrality, which were not mentioned in the initial review. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:54, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The article could also use a copyedit for English grammar. Yoninah (talk) 21:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Length and newness both check out okay. The hook fact is not cited directly in the article, and none of the references I have checked have stated it clearly. Some make references to it having "gone viral", but I'm uneasy about making the two equivalent. Spotchecks using the dup detector reveal no evidence of close paraphrasing, and the neutrality looks alright. But, as Yoninah suggests, a copy-edit is required for both the article and the hook. If Saqib is not confident about completing this, a request could be placed with the WP:GOCE, although their backlog is pretty long. Harrias talk 09:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment the current proposed hook is not written in good English. --Dweller (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Harrias, User:Dweller: I'm quite busy so I'm afraid I won't be able to work on this nomination. Furthermore, I've no issue if this nomination be slushed. --Saqib (talk) 09:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)