Template:Did you know nominations/Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood and the Prison of Belief


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 07:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood and the Prison of Belief (film)

 * ... that HBO used 160 lawyers to vet its film Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood and the Prison of Belief because of the notorious litigiousness of the Church of Scientology (pictured)?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/No. 300 Group RAF

Created by Prioryman (talk). Self nominated at 20:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg nice article; new enough and long enough, and the hook comes is cited to a direct quote from an HBO executive. Image is CC licensed and fine to use. Only concern is that the quote says "probably 160", which sounds like an estimate, whereas the hook presents it as a fact. I think this is inconsequential enough to be okay, for the sake of maintaining interest in the hook. ~ Boomur &#91;☎&#93; 04:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Add the word some to finesse the question of how many:
 * ALT1 ... that HBO used some 160 lawyers to vet its film Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood and the Prison of Belief because of the notorious litigiousness of the Church of Scientology (pictured)?
 * EEng (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's OK with me. Prioryman (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)