Template:Did you know nominations/Govanhill Baths


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  Rcsprinter123    (confabulate)  @ 16:13, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Govanhill Baths

 * ... that Govanhill Baths (pictured) is the last surviving Edwardian public bathhouse in Glasgow?
 * Reviewed: John Lewis Christmas advert
 * Comment: Other hook ideas welcome

Created by Edwardx (talk), Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 23:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC).


 * Can we have a QPQ please ? Then the review can proceed. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Adding icon to indicate that QPQ is still pending over a month after nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reminder. QPQ done. Edwardx (talk) 10:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed for this nomination. Edwardx, note that the copyvio check in your QPQ review was using a deprecated tool; please redo the check for copyvio and close paraphrasing so it can be counted as a complete review. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:16, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Pictures - awesome. Content and writing - awesome. References...we have a 'citation needed' tag sitting in there. Solve that issue and I'll stick a big fat tick on it. (And may I suggest using your award winning picture in the hook rather than the current one?) PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Notice: This article required a full re-edit to conform to sourcing etc. so I have been doing it for an hour or two, so please don't fully rewrite the article as it may take me another hour while I am kept busy with something but it's mostly done and checked and will definitely be DYK standard shortly, thanks :) ~ R.T.G 21:42, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg I re-edited and checked to fully conform to DYK, except for the sentence tagged citation needed. Just remove it if it is being moved to prep please, otherwise I thought it should be left up in the mean time in case a source becomes apparent.  If I should have removed it myself please note that, thanks,  :) ~ R.T.G 21:59, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I added you to the creators. Revert me if I shouldn't have. Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I posted this to Philfrenzys talk but I should have posted here for others, "Although I did a major edit to the article, if I am listed as a creator, nominator or write the hook, I cannot pass it for review, and strictly speaking I am over a month late for that but I'll consider that a compliment to my effort, thanks o/ " ~ R.T.G 22:16, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * As I understand it, there's nothing wrong with you being made a co-creator by the grateful nominators during the course of your review and approval of the hook. (It's happened to me numerous times.) Yoninah (talk) 17:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg I came by to promote it, saw the cite-needed tag, and also saw RTG's instruction to remove the sentence. Not only does that cut the Closure section in half, but it also leaves a 90-year hole in the history, which now stands at one paragraph. I noticed more history in Footnote 4 that should be added to the article; surely there's more? Yoninah (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * It was probably me that put the tag in. You are correct, the whole of the history of the building before closure is missing. I will see what I can find. It may not amount to much if they were just baths for the whole time but it should be in there. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I created a short history section and resolved the tag issue. Should be fine now. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:58, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg It is. To recap: New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. Hook ref verified and cited inline. And that PD image – AWESOME! Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 01:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)