Template:Did you know nominations/Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 01:56, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve, Golden-mantled racket-tail, Chestnut-backed bush warbler, Scaly-breasted kingfisher, Dark-eared myza, Matinan blue flycatcher, Cerulean cuckooshrike, Sulawesi masked owl

 * ... that birds occurring in the Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve in Indonesia include the golden-mantled racket-tail (pictured), the chestnut-backed bush warbler, the Matinan blue flycatcher, the dark-eared myza, the scaly-breasted kingfisher, the cerulean cuckooshrike and the Sulawesi masked owl?
 * Reviewed: Paratropis tuxtlensis
 * Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Art Whitney, Template:Did you know nominations/Jim Donnelly (baseball), Template:Did you know nominations/Mukhalinga,  Template:Did you know nominations/Royal intermarriage,  Template:Did you know nominations/Émilie Fortin Tremblay,  Template:Did you know nominations/Valentino Pittoni,  Template:Did you know nominations/Aaron Carapella

Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 05:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC).


 * First of all, thanks for expanding the seven bird articles. Much needed and appreciated work. Now, the review;


 * Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve: The article meets the length and age criteria. Neutral tone has been used. Article has at least one inline citation per para. No close paraphrasing detected. Hook fact check out with the OBC ref. QPQ done.
 * Golden-mantled racket-tail: 5x expanded. No close paraphrasing detected. Article has at least one inline citation per para. Neutral tone has been used. Hook fact not found in the article. QPQ done.
 * Chestnut-backed bush warbler: 5x expanded. No close paraphrasing detected. Article has at least one inline citation per para. Neutral tone has been used. Hook fact not found in the article. QPQ done.
 * Matinan blue flycatcher: 5x expanded. No close paraphrasing detected. Article has at least one inline citation per para. Neutral tone has been used. Hook fact cited. QPQ done.
 * Dark-eared myza: 5x expanded. No close paraphrasing detected. Article has at least one inline citation per para. Neutral tone has been used. Hook fact not found in the article. QPQ done.
 * Scaly-breasted kingfisher: 5x expanded. No close paraphrasing detected. Article has at least one inline citation per para. Neutral tone has been used. Hook fact cited. QPQ done.
 * Cerulean cuckooshrike: 5x expanded. No close paraphrasing detected. Article has at least one inline citation per para. Neutral tone has been used. Hook fact not found in the article. QPQ done.
 * Sulawesi masked owl: 5x expanded. No close paraphrasing detected. Article has at least one inline citation per para. Neutral tone has been used. Hook fact cited. QPQ done.


 * Symbol question.svg hook fact needs to be added to the articles that don't have it. Ping me when the hook fact has been added.--Skr15081997 (talk) 11:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reviewing this multi-article nomination. I'm not sure whether it is necessary to include the hook fact in each species article. The birds all occur in the Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve and that fact is included in the nature reserve article. Some of the birds have distributions across several Indonesian islands and to pick out one particular minor location on Sulawesi in an article on the bird seems wrong to me. Perhaps we could have another opinion on this point. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * We might use "The bird is found in several places throughout Indonesia including the Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve" or something like that. What do you think?--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed, I can do that, but I'd quite like another view as to whether it is a DYK requirement that the hook fact is found in each article in a multi-article hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I think adding the hook fact to the articles is necessary in this case. I had asked for comments here.--Skr15081997 (talk) 09:55, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I have added the information but it went very much against the grain. It is like saying in the Eastern chipmunk article that one of the places to see it is North Manitou Island, in Lake Michigan. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svgng at this one again, as its still needing it. As of now All 7 articles meet the 5x expansions while the Gunung A. NR is new enough and long enough, spot checking on Cerulean cuckooshrike, Gunung Ambang Nature Reserve and Matinan blue flycatcher did not find any paraphrasing problems or policy violations. The references are all verifiable and neutral The requested (though I agree not needed notation RE GA NR) is now present in the articles. QPQs are done for all articles. image is fair use and main page qualified.-- Kev  min  § 01:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)