Template:Did you know nominations/Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-1,495


 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-1,495

 * ... that Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. Does 1–1,495 was a case in which BitTorrent users could not legally retain their anonymity after charges of copyright infringement were brought against them?

Created by RealmofBears23 (talk). Nominated by Sashashekhar (talk) at 22:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC).


 * Comment: The hook needs to be rewrite as per DYK rules. --Gfosankar (talk) 07:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I got the hook into proper DYK format. Also, it was too long (235 characters), so I changed "uses of the peer-to-peer file sharing software BitTorrent" to simply "BitTorrent users". M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  18:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks Mandarax Sashashekhar (talk) 04:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:03, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg I tweaked the Hook slightly (endash + two links). Article was new enough, long enough, and I did not find any policy violations. Hook looks good. Thank you for writing an article for this case! --Odie5533 (talk) 22:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)