Template:Did you know nominations/Harriet Windsor-Clive, 13th Baroness Windsor


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:51, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Harriet Windsor-Clive, 13th Baroness Windsor

 * ... that during the mid 1850s Harriet Windsor-Clive, 13th Baroness Windsor paid for the construction of the same church twice?


 * Reviewed: Fajr decade

Created by Sionk (talk). Self-nominated at 02:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Created on Feb. 27, nom on Mar 3/new enough. 3927 char/long enough. Neutral. Cited with the exception of this sentence "who became The Baron Windsor and later the 1st Earl of Plymouth when the title was revived in 1905." QPQ done. No image. Hook 126 char/under maximum. Interesting. Cited immediately following to off-line sources. If you can fix the one missing citation it'll be fine. SusunW (talk) 22:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why that sentence is a problem here. It's not about the Baroness Windsor and it's not part of the DYK hook. Sionk (talk) 00:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * because the DYK criteria requires at least one citation to a reliable source for the information contained in the article. Paragraphs can be cited with a single source, unless they are part of the hook, which must have its own citation(s), but the article as a whole is required to be cited throughout. SusunW (talk) 01:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * DYK requires articles to use inline citations and require the fact(s) in the hook to be directly cited. This isn't a GA article, it's a new one. The fact about Baroness Windsor's grandson is incidental, and cited in his article. Sionk (talk) 22:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I've deleted that sentence, though I thinkyou're being harsh. Sionk (talk) 22:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Not trying to be harsh, trying to avoid complications with the nomination when the promoter reviews the approval. If it's cited in his article, I'm not sure why the same source wouldn't work for hers, but as it is not claimed as an uncited statement anymore, you are GTG. AGF hook cited to off-lines sources. SusunW (talk) 22:51, 4 March 2016 (UTC)