Template:Did you know nominations/Henri-Edmond Cross

Henri-Edmond Cross

 * ... that painter Henri-Edmond Cross (example painting pictured) changed his name twice, each time to avoid confusion with a similarly-named artist?
 * Reviewed: Leichtgesinnte Flattergeister, BWV 181
 * Comment: DYKcheck fails, as it doesn't take into account the plagiarism which I removed (see the first edit on February 14). Please check expansion manually.

Created/expanded by Mandarax (talk). Self nom at 21:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Article has not been expanded five fold. --LauraHale (talk) 04:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Yes it has. See my comment above. The version which removed the plagiarism was 973 prose characters. It's currently 8304, an expansion of over eight and a half times. M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  05:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Newnewss measures are:


 * been created (sandbox → mainspace is eligible); or
 * had its prose portion expanded at least fivefold; or
 * had its prose portion expanded at least twofold (only applies to BLPs that were completely unreferenced before expansion)

Expansion clock based on that as I understand it is this source here. If there was copyright and there is an exclusion, will finish the review but please cite where it says that expansions after copyright violation removed reset the expansion length. --LauraHale (talk) 10:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The version you linked to is the one just prior to the one I linked to, which removed copyright violations. According to rule A4, copyright violations are excluded from expansion calculation. Thanks. M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  10:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  21:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

---


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg on length being accurate. Plagiarism that had existed in the article removed.  The current book sources are free of plagiarism.  The hook related text in the article is supported by the book sources.
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article is fully supported by inline sources. Images on page have copyright tags that work.  Article is neutral enough.  Hook is properly formatted. Plagiarism spot check here and here does not give me any major cause for concern. --LauraHale (talk) 01:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Good to go. Sorry about the problems. My fault. :( --LauraHale (talk) 01:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem – there are a lot of rules! Thanks for the review. Oh, and your mentioning the image licenses reminded me that I can use even better ones. They're currently life + 70 years; I'll go change them to life + 100 years. M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  02:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)