Template:Did you know nominations/Hinatuan Enchanted River


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Hinatuan Enchanted River

 * ... that the Hinatuan Enchanted River (pictured) is a hot spring, a lagoon, and a river all at the same time; and is mildly salty due to its flow reversal during high tide?

5x expanded by Schadow1 (talk). Self nominated at 19:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg A good tenfold, but the minimum requirement is 1,500 characters/bytes in prose. Also, some sentences need inline citations. George Ho (talk) 21:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Current revision is 1,413 bytes, eighty-seven bytes short of fifteen-hundred-bytes minimum requirement. George Ho (talk) 21:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * "actually a body of water that is" trimmed from hook. Edwardx (talk) 22:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Expanded exploration details with additional new content and citations. Now over 2,000 bytes. Schadow1 (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Unsure about needing more references, but let's see what another reviewer has to say. George Ho (talk) 18:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I added a sentence from one of article sources about a March 20-24 mapping and assessment of the ecosystem., if nobody has passed this for review at the end of that assessment, might be worth adding the details to the article. The image you have provided for this would be terrific with a lead hook. — Maile (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added more cites to the article. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:28, 25 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed now that article is more than long enough and has additional citations. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm new to reviewing, but this page seems fine to me: written with a neutral point of view, sources have inline citations, no close paraphrasing detected. SojoQ (talk) 00:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Very nice image. Good work with expansion. I believe that it is good to go. Symbol confirmed.svg  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:36, 29 April 2015 (UTC)