Template:Did you know nominations/History of Canadian women

History of Canadian women
Created/expanded by Rjensen (talk) on 27 December 2012. Self nom at 00:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * ... that the history of Canadian women, a group which comprises half the population, has until recent years only accounted for a tiny fraction of the historiography?




 * Listed "History of Canadian women" DYK nomination for discussion.
 * New article on major subject.
 * Article
 * Symbol confirmed.svg The article looks to be written from scratch and was only 3 days old and huge when nominated. -AndrewDressel (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg All but 2 of 64 references are offline, so not much hope of checking for copyright violations. -AndrewDressel (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Hook
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Hook is also first sentence of article, has inline citation to offline reference. -AndrewDressel (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Is it correct English to say that "the history ... comprises half the population"? Would a better verb be "concerns", "covers", or "is about"? -AndrewDressel (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Other
 * Symbol question.svg No indication that nominator has reviewed another nomination. -AndrewDressel (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * A quid pro quo review is not required if the nominator has five or fewer nominations; as best I can tell, this is only Rjensen's second, so not QPQ review is necessary. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote4.png I changed the hook to get this going. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg It seems ridiculous to me that this was left uncleared over confusion over QPQ and grammar. Good to go.  The C of E God save The Queen!  ( talk ) 18:01, 7 February 2013 (UTC)