Template:Did you know nominations/Holy Trinity Anglican Church, Roebourne


 * The "alternate source" is for the article as a whole, and is now footnote 1. I'm not sure what you mean by "replacement". Monument Australia was only ever a supplement to another source, which is also already cited. The hook is sourced to two sources, neither of them Monument Australia: Anglican Diocese of North West Australia: "Holy Trinity Roebourne is ... the oldest church in North West Australia.", Government of Western Australia: "... the oldest church in the Pilbara district ..." Bahnfrend (talk) 09:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No, my problem is that an article itself is supposed to be covered by reliable sources to pass DYK. K. Peake 10:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I don't understand your explanation. Which of the points in the article is not supported by a reliable source? Bahnfrend (talk) 13:54, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * What I mean is that only reliable sources should be USED in the article and I have doubts about the reliability of the aforementioned one. K. Peake 20:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't share your doubts. Monuments Australia is a long established website. Its content is not user-generated; it is edited by two people with appropriate qualifications and/or experience, and relies upon a large number of other reliable sources. It also has many contributors, including 17 "Volunteer Research Officers" from all States and the ACT who for the most part similarly have appropriate qualifications and/or experience. If you use the expressions "monuments australia" and "monumentaustralia.org.au" to search Wikipedia, you will see that the Monuments Australia website is cited as a source for more than 200 other Wikipedia articles on a wide variety of topics. That is a good indication that Wikipedia editors other than myself similarly consider it to be a reliable source. Bahnfrend (talk) 05:16, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I did not know about this reasoning behind the source being reliable since initially, I thought it was lacking after seeing not many staff members on the site. You are entirely correct though, but should have mentioned this initially because I did say I had my doubts, not there is no way this is reliable. Symbol confirmed.svg This should be good to go now, nice job and I see no remaining issues! K. Peake 07:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC)