Template:Did you know nominations/Ian Hummer

Ian Hummer, 2012–13 Princeton Tigers men's basketball team, 2012–13 Harvard Crimson men's basketball team, 2012–13 Ivy League men's basketball season
Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 15:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * ... that Princeton, who is led by 2012 Unanimous All-Ivy selection Ian Hummer, entered the 2012–13 season as the 2012–13 Ivy League men's basketball favorite since a cheating scandal has ensnared Harvard?


 * Query: Can I review a single article hook for the QPQ requirement?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Answer: no, you will need to review four articles, one for each article nominated here. The consensus a few months back was that each article in a nomination requires its own QPQ; please see WP:DYKSG for the rule as it is now. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I will do some reviews.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Roupala montana, which had three articles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Under the current rules, can my fourth QPQ come from Template:Did you know nominations/Adae Festival, Adae Kese Festival, Akwasidae Festival, Awukudae Festival, Ashanti Yam Festival? I have only used 3 of the 5 QPQs from that review.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't see why not. You haven't used it up before now. I understand why you missed the QPQ issue in the Roupala review, though... BlueMoonset (talk) 23:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote4.png Review needed now that QPQ issue has been resolved. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not sure how the QPQ count here is affected. That hook had three articles. This one has four. I thought I could make up the difference with my 4th credit above.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * As I said above, "I don't see why not"; it's article for article, and as long as you supply four reviews, in whatever combination (single, double, triple, etc.), you should be fine. Three Roupalas and one Adae totals four. This is the fourth of the five Adae, leaving you one more from that quintet. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I misintrepretted the symbol as meaning that something was wrong with my nomination here. I now understand that you were just calling for a review.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Now that this DYK has been around so long we might as well put it on the main page during the February 16 Harvard-Princeton game.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If we miss Feb 16 at Harvard, we can shoot for the March 1 game at Princeton.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:04, 13 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote4.png Reiterating need for a reviewer of all four articles and the hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. QPQ checked by BlueMoonset, New Enough: all 4 good (2 new, 2 5x of content), Long enough: all 4 good, Within policy: checked three sources on each articles and no hits for close paraphrasing. The BLP article is neutral and clearly referenced (with BLP tag on talk page). Some non-neutral sources (i.e. GoPrincetonTigers.com) on the 2012-2013 season pages, but usage is not problematic (used for clear facts like scores and are supported by additional sources in articles). Hook All facts in hook are supported in sources and are in the articles. "ensnared in cheating scandal" seems like an appropriate (and based on sources) not-overly-negative description for the hook. Hook is exactly 200 characters. Good to go. Maybe enough lead time for running on February 16. AbstractIllusions (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)