Template:Did you know nominations/Illegality in Singapore administrative law

Illegality in Singapore administrative law

 * ... that the Singapore High Court once held that, by refusing berths to a company running gambling cruises, the port authority had not fettered its discretion – a form of illegality in administrative law?
 * Reviewed: Portsmouth FC Basketball Club
 * Comment: The article was created in a sandbox and moved into the main namespace on 29 February 2012. The hook is referenced by footnotes 92, 94, 97 and 98: see "Illegality in Singapore administrative law".

Created/expanded by Alex.ng.2009 (talk), Claire.lopez (talk), Glen.chiang.2009 (talk), Pradeepconstiadmin (talk), Quekjieying (talk), and Yokteng.sim.2009 (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 17:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article is new enough and long enough based on date of nomination: Article moved from User:Smuconlaw/Illegality in Singapore administrative law on February 29, 2012, Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 312 edits ago on February 12, 2011. All images have copyright tags. Article reads as neutral enough to me. QPQ done. Hook text appears in the article and is supported by sources.
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Hook with spaces is four characters two long. Needs to be made shorter.  Propose alternative?
 * I count 199 characters. Note that the ellipsis and question mark are not included in the character count: "Did you know/Supplementary guidelines, guideline C8. — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * My bad. 200 exactly then. Other issues still need to be addressed though. --LauraHale (talk) 11:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Article is not completely supported by sources. A few fact tags need to be cleaned up.
 * comment: I've dealt with three of the "citation needed" tags. The remaining ones were placed on introductory statements that essentially refer to what follows. For example, the tagged sentence in the section "Whether the public authority exercised its discretion wrongly" simply introduces the reader to the contents of the subsections of that section. I suggest that citations are not necessary for such statements. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Offline sources are free of plagiarism and support the text. Cited sources support hook text. --LauraHale (talk) 00:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Alternative hook needed. Fact tags need to be cleaned up. --LauraHale (talk) 00:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg for a re-review? --PFHLai (talk) 11:11, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, please. The original reviewer has not responded to my comment posted on 15 March above. — SMUconlaw (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg At least two citation needed tags remain. Cunard (talk) 11:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * My response to LauraHale on 15 March was: "The remaining ones were placed on introductory statements that essentially refer to what follows. For example, the tagged sentence in the section 'Whether the public authority exercised its discretion wrongly' simply introduces the reader to the contents of the subsections of that section. I suggest that citations are not necessary for such statements." May I remove the remaining tags? — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:43, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * An editor tagged those sentences as needing citations, so I recommend placing citations at those locations to be safe. DYK requires at least one citation per paragraph. It should be fairly easy, just adding some citations from the subsections. Cunard (talk) 01:15, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, found some suitable references. I think I've addressed all the issues. — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Verified. Cunard (talk) 05:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Close paraphrasing spotcheck
 * The spotcheck of the article for plagiarism and faithfulness to the sources was performed by at 00:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC), so I have not reviewed the sources, most of which I do not have access to. Cunard (talk) 05:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)