Template:Did you know nominations/Inclusive Church


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 18:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator

Inclusive Church

 * ... that Inclusive Church advocates for the full inclusion of all people in the church regardless of ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation?
 * Comment: The rules say that to nominate I should be autoconfirmed; I'm not yet, but hopefully it's not a problem!
 * Comment: The rules say that to nominate I should be autoconfirmed; I'm not yet, but hopefully it's not a problem!

Created by Relentlessly (talk). Self nominated at 12:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Source confirms DYK hook. Best, .jona  talk  01:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg Removed from prep per discussion at WT:DYK, and request from nominator to place this on hold for a couple of weeks while more secondary sources are found, especially for the hook fact. Original review is clearly inadequate, failing to mention basic things like size, newness, neutrality, and close paraphrasing. Once Relentlessly posts here that the article has been updated and is ready, a full review will need to be done. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the prod, . I think I'm going to have to withdraw this. I haven't been able to find satisfactory references so far; the organisation has received less press than I'd thought. Relentlessly (talk) 08:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Thanks for letting us know, Relentlessly. Marking for closure; withdrawn by nominator. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)