Template:Did you know nominations/Insiang


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Insiang

 * ... that Insiang is the first Philippine film ever premiered to be shown at the Cannes Film Festival?
 * ALT1:... that Insiang is the first Philippine film ever to use Tondo, Manila as a shooting location?
 * ALT2:... that during the Martial Law, Imelda Marcos prevented local screenings of the film Insiang as it did not depict a "beautiful view" of the Philippines?
 * Reviewed: Harmonia (visual novel)

5x expanded by Bluesphere (talk). Self-nominated at 16:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Approved with minor alteration to the hook. Premiere implies first screening everywhere.  5x expansion even discounting the plot - which is assumed to be accurately sourced to the subject. - hahnch e n 19:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg  you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It does, else I wouldn't have approved it. - hahnch e n 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * "Explicit" means "spell it out". There is a handy Reviewer's Template above every edit window that you can use if you don't want to write out each criteria yourself. The review you wrote above basically mentions just the 5x expansion; it doesn't mention newness, length, neutrality, close paraphrasing, inline hook cite and hook verification, and completion of QPQ. Such a "review" does not qualify as a QPQ on your part. Best, Yoninah (talk) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't want to write out the 5 criteria, which it meets. - hahnch e n 18:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

, may I ask what's the update with this DYK? I'm just a little worried that this has not been approved to the prep area. Blue sphere  13:13, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Sorry about that, . It looks like we need another review with less drama and more review. I'll try to do it if someone doesn't get to it first. Yoninah (talk) 17:48, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Here's a full review: 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. However, the Plot summary is excessively long; is there any way to shorten this? The 3 images in the article are all fair use. Regarding the hooks, all are verified and cited inline, but I find ALT0 the least hooky, ALT1 OK, and ALT2 the best. QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , the length of the plot comports with WP:FILMPLOT's 700-word limit; it has 685 word count according to my word processor. Blue  sphere  02:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg thanks, I wasn't aware of that word count. All good and good to go (preference for ALT2). Yoninah (talk) 13:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)