Template:Did you know nominations/Japanese government-issued gulden and roepiah in the Netherlands Indies


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fuebaey (talk) 08:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Japanese government-issued gulden and roepiah in the Netherlands Indies

 * ... that, during its occupation of the Dutch East Indies, the Empire of Japan issued both gulden and roepiah (example pictured)?
 * ALT1:... that more Japanese gulden and roepiah (example pictured) may have been issued after the occupation of the Dutch East Indies than during it?
 * Reviewed: Tantai Mieming

5x expanded by Crisco 1492 (talk), Godot13 (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 06:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC).


 * Please revert the title of the article. I don't see why it has to be disambiguated (let alone in such a convoluted manner) in the first place. Fuebaey (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Except, you know, the former title of Netherlands Indian roepiah was inaccurate, as the Japanese money included gulden as well as rupiah (and the Indonesian rupiah was, from a Dutch POV, issued in the Dutch East Indies [until 1949]). There's an argument for a shorter title such as "Japanese-issued gulden and roepiah", but since Godot13 mentioned standardization, I was wondering if he had other articles in mind. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If that is the case why not pick a more general title, like Japanese government-issued currency in the Netherlands Indies? Fuebaey (talk) 15:50, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * That works as well. I'm waiting for a reply from Godot13 first, though. There may be considerations we haven't thought of. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I guess that works for me. I was just going for consistency (but may have sacrificed practicality in the process)...--Godot13 (talk) 02:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not addressing the question above - standardization was with the other article titles in Japanese invasion money in the event they are all made into a GT/FT down the road...--Godot13 (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol voting keep.svg This is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The image is a featured picture and is appropriately licensed. Going for the original hook, which has an inline citation, because I am not sure that ALT1 has this advantage! The article is neutral but I could not assess whether there were any close paraphrasing/copyright issues because the sources are mostly offline. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)