Template:Did you know nominations/Jewish boycott of the Western Wall


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 04:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Article was deleted at AfD; closing the nomination.

Jewish boycott of the Western Wall

 * ... that some Jews refuse to pray at the Western Wall in Jerusalem?



Created by Chesdovi (talk). Self-nominated at 21:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg. Interesting information. I know many people who have traveled to Jerusalem and have never mentioned anything like this. The sources are reliable. I would recommend adding references for the Background section, though. This is good to go.--12george1 (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg No no no,, not yet and certainly not like this. The Background section needs to be copyedited (I just changed "tactic" to "tacit"), it is wholly unverified (that cannot be in a DYK), and it isn't even remotely neutral. , this needs work. Also, I don't see where you did a review of another DYK. Drmies (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I apologize for that. I forgot to check if the nominator had reviewed another article. As for copyediting, I personally didn't notice the need for it, but now that looks like a valid concern. Now "(that cannot be in a DYK)", are you suggesting an alternative hook should be proposed, ?--12george1 (talk) 00:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, the hook is fine: it's the actual article... Drmies (talk) 03:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I have added refs to the Background section. I'm also not sure where the neutrality issues lie. (I was unaware that I was required to review another nomination). Chesdovi (talk) 16:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * IMO this is a sensationalist approach to a long-known position of the Satmar Rebbes regarding their opposition to the Zionist state. Adding in Amram Blau and the Neturei Karta is a limp attempt to make this into an "issue". It would be better to keep this information in the Satmar article and remove this page from Wikipedia. Yoninah (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Now at AFD. Yoninah (talk) 00:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)