Template:Did you know nominations/Joaquín Clausell


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:00, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Joaquín Clausell

 * ... that Mexican painter Joaquín Clausell was known as "Lawyer Chicken"?

5x expanded by Thelmadatter (talk). Self nominated at 13:13, 2 November 2014 (UTC).


 * Comment: this is an orphaned nomination from November 2014 which has been rescued per the discussion at WT:DYK. I have given it a copy edit and confirmed to the best of my ability that there are no copyvios; however, the majority of sources are AGF as off-line. As his notability stems from his art, it seemed to me that the hook should have to do with that rather than an obscure fact about his law practice, so I propose two hooks:
 * ALT1: ... that the National Council for Culture & Arts of Mexico and the Campeche State Cultural Ministry have sponsored a biennial juried art event to honor Mexican impressionist Joaquín Clausell since 1993?


 * ALT2: ... that the work of Joaquín Clausell stands out among Mexican landscape artists because it is in the impressionist style (example pictured)?
 * I wasn't sure if I had to provide a review since there isn't one and it's a save, but I reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Scottish Diaspora Tapestry. If it is not required, please advise and I will use it for another nomination. Should anything else be needed, please ping me and I will do my best to assist. SusunW (talk) 03:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. (Note: supplied QPQ is required.) BlueMoonset (talk) 06:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol voting keep.svg At first I thought that this article did not qualify for DYK because it is neither new nor five-times expanded. However I now realise that it does qualify as explained by SusunW above. I think ALT1 is boring but ALT2 is satisfactory and more interesting, and is sufficiently cited inline. The image is in the public domain and the article is neutral. I have no particular view about close paraphrasing because of lack of access to the sources which are mostly in the Spanish language. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)