Template:Did you know nominations/Kathrin Barboza Marquez


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Kathrin Barboza Marquez

 * ... that Kathrin Barboza Marquez rediscovered the Lonchorhina aurita in Bolivia which had been thought to be extinct in the country?


 * ALT1:... that Kathrin Barboza Marquez was the first Bolivian scientist to receive a L'Oréal-UNESCO Award for Women in Science?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rosemary Stjernstedt
 * Comment: for WikiProject Women in Red Women Scientist's Editathon

Created by SusunW (talk). Self-nominated at 18:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol voting keep.svg Well its long enough and well reffed. The hooks have a ref each (in Spanish). There is no loaded language and no image. I would use Tomes's sword-nosed bat (or even a bat with a long nose) in the main hook to show readers its not a rather boring leaf mould, but its still a good hook. Apart from learning to speak Spanish then thats the best I can do. Reads well, well done. Victuallers (talk) 23:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review on bat woman ! I didn't call it "Tome's sword-nosed bat" because all the Spanish sources called it the "Bolivian sword-nosed bat" or "common sword-nosed bat". Other than the scientific name being the same, there isn't a tie in to the reference to "Tome's" that I was able to find and I don't know why our article on the Lonchorhina aurita calls it that (it looks like that was the name of a book that published information about it rather than what any Spanish source would call the bat whose territory is completely in Central, South America and the Caribbean?). I also wasn't sure if one could call it the "Lonchorhina aurita bat" or "bat, Lonchorhina aurita" because I have no idea what naming protocols for creatures actually are. Whatever the promoter is fine with I am too. SusunW (talk) 23:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * , For the purpose of a hook, I don't think we need to worry about what Spanish sources call Lonchorhina aurita (which should always be italicized, in any case) for the English Wikipedia, and a common-name that establishes it as an animal will be more interesting to readers than an unfamiliar scientific name. "Tomes's sword-nosed bat" or even "Common sword-nosed bat" I think is much preferable to Lonchorhina aurita, for a hook that wil actually hook readers. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * As I said, I'm good with whatever. I've been burned before on what was a pretty straight forward DYK on a name not matching sources. Still have one floating here only because a reviewer couldn't decide if it should be approved if the subject's name didn't exactly match the sources (Beverly Loraine Greene/Beverly L. Greene/Beverly Greene). So, I am hesitant to differ from the sources. I'd prefer "common sword-nosed bat" to Tomes if we can go that way. SusunW (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm still OK with hooks above, however maybe we could just fudge the name of the bat...Victuallers (talk) 23:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * (alt2).. that Kathrin Barboza Marquez found a bat that was lost in Bolivia?
 * I am dying laughing. Obviously, we all like the bat reference best ;) What about this one ? SusunW (talk) 23:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Alt3 Victuallers (talk) 00:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * (ALT3) ... that Kathrin Barboza Marquez rediscovered a bat in Bolivia which had been thought to be extinct in the country?