Template:Did you know nominations/Kentex slipper factory fire


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 12:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Article has previously been featured at ITN.

Kentex slipper factory fire

 * ... that the Kentex slipper factory fire is the third worst fire in Philippine history after the Ozone Disco Club fire in 1996 and the Manor Hotel fire in 2001?



Created by ThaddeusB (talk). Nominated by Shhhhwwww!! (talk) at 21:02, 23 May 2015 (UTC).




 * : REVIEW COMPLETED - The following review was completed by Esemono 
 * Green check.svg Article created by ThaddeusB on May 16, 2015 and 4393 characters (720 words) "readable prose size"
 * Green check.svg NPOV
 * Green check.svg Hook is interesting and sourced with Ref 1
 * Green check.svg Hook is sourced to :CNN - The Kentex footwear factory fire at Valenzuela City was tagged as the third worst fire incident in the country, according to the Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP).The Manor Hotel fire, which happened in 2001 at Quezon City and claimed 75 lives, was second in the list. It came after the Ozone disco fire in 1996 which claimed 160 lives
 * Green check.svg Every paragraph sourced
 * Green check.svg Earwig @ Toolserver Copyvio Detector found no copyvio other than quotes from the article
 * Symbol possible vote.svg No QPQ
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Waiting for QPQ but User Shhhhwwww!! appears to have a number of DYK noms with outstanding QPQ including -- Esemono (talk) 05:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Marco Archer Moreira
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Rodrigo Gularte


 * Question: Does a prior WP:ITN disqualify an article for WP:DYK, or is it only for articles that are currently in ITN? I mean, this article already had its time in the sun, and at a more prominent place in a far longer time. – H T  D  01:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg It does, per Rule 1e. The article is not eligible for DYK since it appeared over at ITN on the 16 May. Fuebaey (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)