Template:Did you know nominations/Kosmos 2481

Kosmos 2481

 * ... that satellite Kosmos 2481 was launched by a rocket called rockot?
 * Reviewed: University of Freiburg Faculty of Biology

Created/expanded by Secretlondon (talk). Self nom at 23:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)



Just made a slight copy-edit to put the references at the end of the sentence which is the hook. It is now good to go. Aaron  &bull; You Da  One 13:47, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Newly created, more than 1500 characters, interesting hook, but where is the sourced for "It was launched by a Rockot carrier rocket with a Briz-KM upper stage at 01:35 UTC on 28 July 2012." ? Is it footnotes 1 and 2 and the end of the section's paragraph? Symbol question.svg Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 13:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Date and length fine. Photo licensed-I'm impressed by your work on the image. Article well-referenced, no copy vios detected. Ref 3 AGF. Small copy edits. QPQ done. One small item: the pdf for Ref 6 is 80 pages. It needs a page(s) number so I can check that last source. Thank you. Anne (talk) 13:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Erm I reviewed this 25 minutes ago. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 13:38, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Aaron, the source for the sentence above is in Refs 1 and 2, as well as some of the other sources. Anne (talk) 13:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay. The references would be better placed at the end of the sentence which has been used for the book, otherwise it just looks like WP:OR. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 13:44, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The ref to the 80 page pdf has page numbers - page 15 in both cases - small number after each mention. Best (only?) way of doing page numbers with list defined references. Secretlondon (talk) 18:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg like it's going to have two reviews. I finished my copy edit portion of the review at 13:04 Wikipedia time. (I've seen other noms where two editors reviewed an article at the same time.) Anne (talk) 13:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC) Please do not attempt to hide my review of this article. Anne (talk) 13:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No, look at the History. You wrote a review 16 minutes after I had published mine. I've said it's good to go. It doesn't need to have two reviews. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 13:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No one is attempting to take away your credit for doing a review. However, as an editor who did a thorough review of this article this morning, including copy edits that were finished 12 minutes before you signed off on your review, I have a small concern that needs to be addressed. I don't know why you are persisting at this. It seems an incredible waste of time. And I don't appreciate your attempt to hide my review or subsequent comments. Anne (talk) 14:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't understand how you are saying you did it before me? Are you saying it took you hours and hours to review a hook? It only takes a couple of minutes, max. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 15:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't believe that you're still obsessing about this. However, it does concern me that you believe that a thoughtfully researched and written article with eight sources, including an eighty page pdf, only deserves "a couple of minutes, max" of review. Anne (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It really doesn't take that long, especially not 30 minutes. Aaron  &bull; You  Da  One 17:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If you are only taking 2 mins max you are not doing it properly. Secretlondon (talk) 20:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I have other unreviewed hooks if people want - Template:Did you know nominations/Okno-S and Template:Did you know nominations/Krona-N. Thanks to both of you for reviewing my work. Secretlondon (talk) 18:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg You're very welcome and you're all set to go. I inserted page 15 in your pdf ref. I also noticed your update of your article. Thank you. Anne (talk) 00:51, 18 August 2012 (UTC)