Template:Did you know nominations/Liborio Vidal Aguilar


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw (talk) 03:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Liborio Vidal Aguilar

 * ... that for nearly 25 years, Liborio Vidal Aguilar has donated his salary earned as a public official in Yucatán to charitable causes?


 * Reviewed: Sydney Hobart Ball

5x expanded by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 21:11, 25 July 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Article is at 5x expansion at time of nomination, there are enough inline citations, it is mostly written neutrally (see point below re: Hook). QPQ done. Hook: Unfortunately I don't think we can use this (though it is the most interesting part of the article) as it has only got one source - and even that one suggests his claim might be to gain political points. Can you find an additional source for this statement? Or an alternative hook suggestion? ツStacey (talk) 15:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Sources 4 and 5 both deal with this topic, and I've added a third. Raymie (t • c) 17:26, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Thanks for this; I am much more confident about the hook now; the article does need a sentence to mention that he has been accused of using his donations to gain political points (mentioned in 2 of the sources) - it doesn't seem that is the case but it needs to be mentioned to keep the article neutral. I've given a blue tick as I used google translate to read sources and so can't be 100% sure I interpreted them correctly. ツStacey (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Vidal said that there were no political aims in this initiative; there's no mention of, say, PAN officials concerned of misuse of funds or anything like that, which is why I didn't include it. Raymie (t • c) 18:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)