Template:Did you know nominations/Liquidambar changii


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Liquidambar changii
Source: " encased within the chert (Figs. 8, 9, 13–18, 20–24, 26, 27, 29). Others were found secondarily weathered out from the matrix, revealing their three-dimensional organization (Figs. 3, 4, 7). Still other specimens represent casts of individual fruits" (Pigg, K. B.; Ickert-Bond, S. M.; Wen,, J. (2004)) Source: "Fossils were recovered from the locality referred to locally as the “County Line Holes,” primarily from the area within the site designated “Hi Hole” by the original collectors, T. H. Tuggle and Raymond D. Foisy." (Pigg, K. B.; Ickert-Bond, S. M.; Wen,, J. (2004))
 * ... that the extinct sweetgum Liquidambar changii was described from petrified fossil fruits and hollow fruit casts in chert?
 * ALT1:... that the extinct sweetgum Liquidambar changii was described from the "Hi hole" location in Central Washington State?
 * Reviewed: Sicyos angulatus
 * Comment: Reviewed Echinocystis of the nomination

Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 16:39, 26 December 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg This article is new enough and long enough. The hooks are sourced inline, the article is neutral and neither Earwig nor I detected any close paraphrasing. Either hook could be used but I prefer ALT0. It might be helpful to expand the lead a little, otherwise it is liable to be tagged with "lead too short". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:44, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't chert, a possibly unfamiliar term, be wikilinked?  P p p er y 21:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)