Template:Did you know nominations/List of Nanjing Metro stations


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:18, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

List of Nanjing Metro stations

 * ... that the Nanjing Metro system in Nanjing, China has a total of 139 stations, with transfer stations counted once for every line they serve? Source: Calculated in the article. Each line has a source detailing (in Chinese, but should be easy to spot if you can read numbers) the number of stations. They are added together per WP:CK as a "mathematical truism".
 * Reviewed: BHIM

Created by Haha169 (talk). Self-nominated at 05:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC).




 * Thank you for your review! While I see that you've already approved it, I agree that my hook is a little bland, so what about this alternate:


 * ALT1"...that Sanshanjie Station in 1992 became the first Nanjing Metro station to begin construction, eight years before construction commenced on the full system? Source: Ref and source in lead, relevant section in source: 1992年，南京市结合中山南路南下工程，开始建设地铁试验站——三山街站...地铁一号线才得以在2000年12月12日正式开工 --haha169 (talk) 15:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid the new hook would be unacceptable. I can understand Chinese, but the article does not mention the 2000 construction commencement. feminist  16:12, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes it does, the second part of what I quoted above in the source clearly says how construction commenced in 2000: 地铁一号线才得以在2000年12月12日正式开工 --haha169 (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg OK, now I see it, List of Nanjing Metro stations does mention this fact, albeit in a roundabout way. feminist  02:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

I see what you mean, I will make this fact more clear in the article. Thank you for taking the time to review! --haha169 (talk) 03:28, 26 January 2017 (UTC)