Template:Did you know nominations/List of National Democratic Alliance members


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sstflyer 09:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

List of National Democratic Alliance members

 * ... that the National Democratic Alliance is the ruling coalition in India under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi (pictured)?



Moved to mainspace by Bharatiya29 (talk). Self-nominated at 10:40, 5 September 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol voting keep.svg Nice article. It's new enough. The prose is narrowly long enough (1600+ characters). The picture appears PD. The sources look reliable. There are some non-English sources so AGF on those. Good to go! Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg The hook is not interesting at all. The coalition has been in power for more than 15 months. A better hook should be featured on the main page.--Skr15081997 (talk) 11:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Also the explanatory note regarding the table (3rd para in the lead) is completely unnecessary in its current position. It should be put inside efn. If this is followed then the total prose size will fall below 1500 characters. These things should be corrected. Regards, --Skr15081997 (talk) 11:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have moved that para to Notes section, and now the article has 1581 characters. Bharatiya29 (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ALT1: ... that among the founder members of the National Democratic Alliance, only the Shiv Sena had an idelogy similar to that of the alliance leader Bharatiya Janata Party? Bharatiya29 (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg The new hook is cited to 2 sources; one uses "can be said" and the other is offline, so AGF on that. Image would not be used with the new hook. All the remaining points of the initial review hold good. Good to go.--Skr15081997 (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)